<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leading by Bleeding &#8211; my tech map</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/leading-by-bleeding-my-tech-map/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/leading-by-bleeding-my-tech-map/</link>
	<description>colorful back and forth from two highly opinionated programmers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Grillo</title>
		<link>http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/leading-by-bleeding-my-tech-map/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Grillo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And what about Delphi/Object Pascal?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what about Delphi/Object Pascal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luca Candela</title>
		<link>http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/leading-by-bleeding-my-tech-map/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luca Candela]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t be too hasty in labeling Java &quot;on the way out&quot; but I agree with most of your assesments, and I also like very much the concise way you found to show both your competences and your vision of the state of technology!

Good work, very inspiring.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be too hasty in labeling Java &#8220;on the way out&#8221; but I agree with most of your assesments, and I also like very much the concise way you found to show both your competences and your vision of the state of technology!</p>
<p>Good work, very inspiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjaminplee</title>
		<link>http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/leading-by-bleeding-my-tech-map/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[benjaminplee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nate, what are your thoughts on this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate, what are your thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjaminplee</title>
		<link>http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/leading-by-bleeding-my-tech-map/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[benjaminplee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I liked your diagram better for showing the flow of the technologies.  Honestly, this was just simpler.  &quot;Crazy Ruby Testing Tools&quot; is because of the rapidly evolving and very different testing tools some coworkers of mine have been using lately on an internal Rails project.  They can produce some pretty amazing tests compared to your average JUnit test.  Thanks for the comments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked your diagram better for showing the flow of the technologies.  Honestly, this was just simpler.  &#8220;Crazy Ruby Testing Tools&#8221; is because of the rapidly evolving and very different testing tools some coworkers of mine have been using lately on an internal Rails project.  They can produce some pretty amazing tests compared to your average JUnit test.  Thanks for the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/leading-by-bleeding-my-tech-map/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice and simple.  At first I was a bit confused (since &quot;on the way out&quot; is in the middle), but it looks pretty reasonable.  I like &quot;Crazy Ruby Testing Tools&quot;...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice and simple.  At first I was a bit confused (since &#8220;on the way out&#8221; is in the middle), but it looks pretty reasonable.  I like &#8220;Crazy Ruby Testing Tools&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
