<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: rock smashes scissors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/rock-smashes-scissors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/rock-smashes-scissors/</link>
	<description>colorful back and forth from two highly opinionated programmers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 10:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: solrize</title>
		<link>http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/rock-smashes-scissors/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[solrize]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 02:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/?p=586#comment-154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just also did a Haskell version (72 lines), though it has very poor error handling.   Maybe I can clean it up some and post it here.  I don&#039;t know how much time I spent but it was more than 2 hours.  I&#039;m still at the stage of doing quite a bit of refactoring and head scratching as I write even simple Haskell code.  I wonder if one gets past that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just also did a Haskell version (72 lines), though it has very poor error handling.   Maybe I can clean it up some and post it here.  I don&#8217;t know how much time I spent but it was more than 2 hours.  I&#8217;m still at the stage of doing quite a bit of refactoring and head scratching as I write even simple Haskell code.  I wonder if one gets past that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjaminplee</title>
		<link>http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/rock-smashes-scissors/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[benjaminplee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twoguysarguing.wordpress.com/?p=586#comment-144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, you have officially renewed my interest in Haskell. The idea of &quot;beautiful code&quot; is definitely in the eye of the beholder and makes for some interesting discussions.  In my youth I loved small elegant pieces of code full of cleverness.  Then I switched and was focused more on finished code that did exactly and only what the client needed.  Now I am battling with how to make elegant simple code that is exactly and only what was needed ... but still looks beautiful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, you have officially renewed my interest in Haskell. The idea of &#8220;beautiful code&#8221; is definitely in the eye of the beholder and makes for some interesting discussions.  In my youth I loved small elegant pieces of code full of cleverness.  Then I switched and was focused more on finished code that did exactly and only what the client needed.  Now I am battling with how to make elegant simple code that is exactly and only what was needed &#8230; but still looks beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
